Debate on ban trade in ancestral remains in British House of Lords

At present, the law that regulates the storage and use of human remains in the UK only requires consent for acquiring and holding body tissue from people under 100 years old. Fiona Twycross, a junior minister in the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, acknowledged that the guidance was dated and “the world has changed substantially” since then.

The debate came after the report with 14 recomendations of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Afrikan-Reparations (APPG-AR) (made up of parliamentarians, campaigners and community members) calling for a ban on the sale and display of ancestral remains, including Egyptian mummies.

The Human Tissue Act 2004 also only prohibits people from buying, selling and possessing body parts for transplantation.

The report, titled “Laying Ancestors to Rest,” outlined the distress caused to diaspora communities by British institutions holding ancestral remains, many of which were taken during colonial rule.

“The mummified person has historically been traded among the upper classes of Britain and France as a luxurious commodity, also featuring as entertainment in British ‘mummy unwrapping parties’ in the 19th century,” the report said.

Junior minister Fiona Twycross: incomplete databases and collections make it hard to know where human remains are being kept but the recommendations put forward in the report “will inform the government’s consideration” of the issues.

Twycross said ministers regularly meet with museums and that she would ensure that this was raised as an issue.

Controversy surrounding the display and auction of human remains persists globally.

RM* thanks for the contribution to this item