Provenance and restitution of works tested by the public at the Quai Branly

[ in French ] Marie-Anne Léourier administered a questionnaire focused on these questions to visitors of the permanent collections area of ​​the Quai Branly – Jacques Chirac Museum (MQB).

Analysis of the responses confirms the public’s interest in restitutions and, consequently, provenance research.

  • 95% of visitors had heard of them
  • The issue of restitutions is considered important (56%), or even very important (28%)
  • 66% of visitors expressed interest in the history of the collections, a percentage that rises to 73% for first-time visitors
  • This interest is more pronounced among young people (86% of 18-25 year olds

But the mechanisms of restitution are poorly understood.

  • In fact, 87% of visitors admit to knowing nothing about the legal framework surrounding it.

Indeed, the issue of restitution has entered the public consciousness through the media, in the context of specific cases: the treatment of human remains, individual or collective claims, media campaigns surrounding these restitutions, and political discourse.

Reactions to these events are initially emotional. Restitution is viewed primarily as a moral issue, a principle of justice.

From this perspective, visitors interviewed often express support for restitution, even without being asked.

However, public opinion oscillates between two imagined extremes: “everything was stolen” and “they’re going to empty the museum.”