Propaganda and plunder from the Summer Palace in Taiwan and elsewhere

Kate Fitz Gibbon notes that Chinese cultural claims to the return of artifacts looted during the attack on the Summer Palace in 1860, the Boxer Rebellion of 1900, and the Japanese invasion in the first half of the 20th century support the country's anti-Taiwanese and nationalist propaganda. But she also wants China to become more self-critical, not to exaggerate about the number of lost relics and to also tackle the abuses in its own country.

In 1925, the Nationalist government led by Chiang Kai-shek turned the Forbidden City into the National Palace Museum. Soon afterward, China was plunged into war, first against Japan and then in a civil war between the Nationalists and the Communists.

To protect the imperial treasures from being captured or destroyed, officials repeatedly moved them across China over a period of about fifteen years. [RM*: read about this Adam Brookes (2022) Fragile Cargo – China’s wartime rtace to save the treasures of the Forbidden City.]

Remains of the Old Summer Palace

The collection was taken to Nanjing, the Nationalist capital, and then moved farther inland as Japanese forces advanced. After World War II, many treasures were returned to Beijing and Nanjing.

But by 1948-49, Communist forces under Mao Zedong were close to defeating the Nationalists. Fearing the collection would fall into Communist hands, the Nationalist government decided to send many of the most valuable objects to Taiwan.

The selective retelling of the story today has lost none of the emotional impact for many people in China. For years Chinese state media and sympathetic commentators have claimed that millions of “stolen” Chinese artifacts from the Summer Palace remain in foreign museums and private collections in Taiwan, Europe and North America, often implying that entire institutional holdings were looted outright by imperial armies.

At the same time, a number of events have taken place thar remain more hidden in the country’s propaganda. Apart from the destruction during the country’s Cultural Revolution and the continuing culural destruction in Tibet and Esatern Turkestan, Fitz Gibbon mentions:

  • the Nanjing Museum, which has been accused of internally laundering, mislabeling, and selling national treasures through domestic channels
  • a gang of fourteen that stole jade, lapis, and rhinoceros-horn objects from British museums, many specifically associated with the Summer Palace. Authorities believed some of the unrecovered objects were trafficked into China, where wealthy collectors viewed the acquisitions as patriotic recoveries rather than criminal contraband.